It seems like the software/slicer that is holding it back. (speed, heights, widths, etc) That all being said, my P3P works really well. Am I missing something? For clarification, I imported my printer profile into Canvas from Simplif圓D so the print settings are identical.

$print halves of model simplify 3d$

It seems like Canvas/kissslicer has a difficult time creating good surface PATHS when using a larger nozzle and leaves gaps. To remove the gaps in Canvas using Kisslicer, I have to “cheat” and tweak the width to 0.3mm (half of actual) and tweak the multiplier to 140%. The printed top and bottom surfaces are pristine. The gaps are clearly visible in the preview and are represented in the final print. I print with a 0.6mm nozzle with a 0.62mm width. No matter what settings I use for gap fill, the gaps remain (on or off and a multitude of fill sizes were tried). Example: If I were to slice a simple 100x100x3mm block using Canvas, the results will have gaps on the surfaces (top and bottom). Pings and Pongs are good and transition quality is excellent but the QUALITY of the print is so much better when I slice using Simplif圓D. My P3P is calibrated and the prints do finish successfully in terms of filament production. I’ve already spent enough time fiddling with Canvas/Kissslicer to get good prints but I still can’t match the results I get with Simplif圓D. Since Mosaic says the engine is experimental, I didn’t spend a lot of time trying to figure it out. It gave no indication what setting caused it. I don’t recall what it was but it happened every time. The error message returned was not helpful in determining the cause. Canvas returns an error shortly after hitting the slice button. I have tried to slice with Slic3r/Prusaslicer engine several times and have been unsuccessful each time. Canvas is so core to Palette printing it would be nice to know what is coming/planned and would certainly curtail many of my posts. What is frustrating is that we don't get any feedback as to any future plans/upgrades for Canvas. I think it could expedite development and getting features into the pipeline. It would be cool if they held more of them covering threads like this one and at open it up for discussion/feedback/feature requests. Mosaic had a really informative livestream last night.

What about commercial or manufacturing entities that are interested in incorporating the Elements and Arrays into their workflows or production environments? Why not have a toggle that exposes more advanced settings similar to Simplify? Power users could tweak all day and casual users could plug & play. Hopefully, Canvas will cater to both the casual user and advanced user. The hardware is robust and capable but the heartbeat is the software/firmware.

I still have my P1 profiles in Simplif圓D.

Print halves of model simplify 3d